Showing posts with label Culture. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Culture. Show all posts

Sunday, 24 July 2011

Top Moscow advertising company sold by under-fire Murdoch

Rupert Murdoch, under fire media mogul, is selling his Russian advertising company News Outdoor to investment bank VTB Capital.

News broke on Friday that a consortium including VTB Capital, Alfa Capital Partners and several private investors had closed a deal to buy the company.

“The deal was closed a few hours ago,” Peter Harvey, one of the minds behind the buy up, told RBC. He did not offer details of the agreement. According to one source, “on the whole the original structure of the transaction and its price have not changed,” the paper reported.

“The Board of Directors has appointed Yevgeny Senderov of VTB Capital as president of News Outdoor Russia,” a press release from the bank said

Murdoch was one of several international media figures that paid court to Russia’s burgeoning media industry in the topsy-turvy 1990s.

News Outdoor is a heavy hitter in the billboard advertising business. The advertising hoardings are strewn across the Russian capital and rake in $400 to $4,000 a month.

Departed mayor Yury Luzhkov was slated for his failure to bring widespread display advertising around town under control, they have become a significant source of income for mid-ranking city officials .

This now looks set to change, the bank said in a statement that the new management will, “interact with the federal and municipal authorities to implement programs aimed at improving the appearance of cities,” the press release said.

That comment is perhaps mindful of moves afoot in City Hall, where Luzhkov’s replacement Sergei Sobyanin is set to eliminate large-scale banner advertising.

Bolshoi restoration - opening night draws near

The big restoration of the Bolshoi theatre is drawing to an end – and Spanish tenor Placido Domingo has made the very first appearance on the hallowed boards.

“He was the first foreign star who came out to the restored historical stage and even sang a fragment from [Tchaikovsky’s opera] ‘Queen of Spades’,” Anatoly Iskanov, the Bolshoi’s director told journalists.

And all music lovers will be able to check the revived acoustics of the theatre’s main stage in just few months time, he assured, as the six-year restoration finally faces the final curtain.

The big date has been set for Oct. 28, after a final round of minor delays ended plans to open up on Oct. 11 – the resonant date 11.11.11. A new staging of Glinka’s “Ruslan and Lyudmila”, one the first Russian operas, is to open the long-awaited season.

Sneaking into the premiere won’t be possible for the average opera lover, although it is to be broadcast live on the screens outside the Bolshoi and in 600 cinemas all around the world.

Earlier this month, Vladimir Resin, Moscow’s deputy mayor, said October 17 was the big date.

Tchaikovsky’s ballet “Sleeping Beauty”, Christmas-classic “Nutcracker”, a revival of Mussorgsky’s opera “Boris Godunov” and some performance from the Milan’s La Scala are all on the playlist for the upcoming season.

And some of the performances that are currently running on the theatre’s Novaya Stsena are to be transferred to the historical stage.

The recent premiere of Rimsky-Korsakov’s opera “Golden Cockerel” kick starts the new season on the smaller stage and no plans to move the performance to the main hall have been proposed yet.

During the restoration, the Bolshoi’s interiors have recreated their original appearance. The original unique acoustics of the opera house have been completely revived, Anatoly Iskanov, the Bolshoi’s director told journalists.

Concrete floors in the main hall and the orchestra pit, which prevented the building from collapsing during the Soviet era, have been replaced with state-of-the-art materials that won’t deaden the sound.

And a new underground hall is to be stuffed with modern technology making it a versatile space for different kinds of performance.

Friday, 22 July 2011

Chelyabinsk set to spend on cleaning its on-image

Chelyabinsk, a notorious industrial capital with a grim nuclear legacy, is planning a major clean-up operation – but only online.

The authorities in the Ural city, dubbed “Tankograd” by residents in tribute to its manufacturing centers, is willing to pay to ensure that only positive references top the online rankings.

It’s a hi-tech approach to Soviet-style propaganda, and the plan is to get the good news on to Google and Yandex, banishing problems to the foot of the table.

“I thought there was nothing left which could surprise me in the field of state procurement. But this order, announced by the Chelyabinsk directorate general of material resources, must surely infuriate any decent person,” wrote anti-corruption crusader Alexei Navalny in his blog.

“It’s understandable when internet shop U Ashota optimizes its search potential, so that it’s easier to find the shashlyk shop. But when an organ of state power swindles state money and wants people looking for ‘Disaster at Mayak’ to receive 80 per cent positive feedback it is simply disgusting and immoral,” he said.

That Mayak disaster, from 1957, saw a container of highly radioactive waste explode at a nuclear reprocessing plant 150 km from the city. Some experts rated the fallout as comparable with that of the Hiroshima bomb in 1945.

The contaminated area affected up to 300, 000 people across Chelyabinsk, Kurgan and Sverdlovsk regions. 200, 000 people died from radiation poisoning in the first ten days after the accident and the total body count climbed to 250, 000. It measured six on the seven-point international scale assessing radioactive disasters, with only Chernobyl and the recent Fukushima meltdown scoring higher.

However, with the Soviets jealously guarding information about their fledgling nuclear program, details of the blast were scarce – when Chernobyl caught fire in 1986 it was widely believed to be the USSR’s first nuclear accident.

he proposed online make-over could struggle to make the desired impact, though, with some saying that a 360,000 ruble ($13,000) budget just isn’t enough.

To do the job properly would cost 10 times that amount.

Tuesday, 19 July 2011

Moscow's iconic St. Basil's Cathedral to mark 450th birthday

uly 12 marks the 450th birthday of Pokrovsky Cathedral, better known as St. Basil's Cathedral, located on Red Square. On this day in 1561 its construction was completed. On the day of its anniversary, the Cathedral invites visitors who care about the cultural heritage and Orthodox Russia.

Currently, Pokrovsky Cathedral is a place of tourist "pilgrimage". Despite the fact that Moscow is full of attractions, not many of them are easily recognizable by visitors, especially foreigners. In this respect, St. Basil's Cathedral can be called a real "brand" of the capital, whose visual image is familiar to the overwhelming majority both in Russia and abroad. Its global significance is the fact that the cathedral was included in the list of the World Heritage sites by UNESCO.

On the anniversary celebration, July 12, a visit to the Cathedral and tours will be offered free of charge to all visitors. Sessions will be held every 30 minutes. Visitors can get acquainted with its restored interiors and new exhibition, listen to spiritual choir "Doros" and the bells by the bell ringers of the Moscow Kremlin.
The history of the Pokrovsky Cathedral is taught in Russian schools. It was erected in 1555-1561 by the order of Tsar Ivan the Terrible to commemorate the victory of Russian troops over the Kazan Khanate and the capture of Kazan. There is still no clarity as to the "copyright" since there are three theories of its creators. According to one of them, the most likely, it was created by a famous Russian architect from Pskov, Postnik Yakovlev, nicknamed Barma. According to another theory, Barma and Postnik are not one person but two different architects who worked together to build the Cathedral. According to the third theory not confirmed by any documentary sources, the cathedral was built by an unknown Italian architect.

According to a legend, when the cathedral was completed and Ivan the Terrible saw its brilliance, he turned to the master with a question whether he could build a temple equal in beauty or even surpassing it. Upon hearing an affirmative answer, the Tsar, unwilling to have another such architectural masterpiece, ordered to blind the architect. Most likely, this story really is just a legend. According to the documented data (if we consider that the Cathedral was created by Postnik), he could not be blinded, because within a few years after the completion of the Pokrovsky Cathedral he participated in the construction of the Kazan Kremlin.

The story of the Pokrovsky Cathedral is surrounded by numerous legends. In particular, there are legends about the "second" name of the Cathedral - Saint Basil's Cathedral. Initially, the Cathedral stood in place of a white stone Trinity Church, where the most revered in Russia fool-for-Christ Basil was buried. The legend has it that he was collecting money for the construction of the Pokrovsky Cathedral. He would bring it to the Red Square and threw it over his right shoulder, and nobody, even thieves, touched these coins. Before his death in August of 1552, he gave it to Ivan the Terrible, who soon ordered to build a temple on the site. According to another legend, Ivan the Terrible built the temple in honor of his father Basil III. Some attribute the following phrase to him: "I will be remembered by people without a church a thousand years later, but I want my parent to be remembered." It is for this reason that the Cathedral, allegedly, became known as St. Basil's Cathedral.

In addition to the many legends, there is some interesting evidence on the architectural features of the Cathedral. Everything - from the number of caps to their location in relation to each other - has a special Christian symbolism. The cathedral is an architectural image of the biblical New Jerusalem - the Kingdom of God described in Revelation. The cathedral consists of eight churches, organized around the ninth towering over them pillar-like church in honor of the Protection of the Mother of God. The number "eight" represents the day of Christ's resurrection, which in Hebrew calendar was the eighth day, and the coming kingdom of heaven - the kingdom of "Eighth Century" (or "Eighth Kingdom"), which comes after the Second Coming of Christ, after the end of the earth's history related to apocalyptic number "seven". In the old St. Basil Cathedral there were 25 domes designating the Lord, and 24 elders sitting around His throne. Currently there are only ten.

Putin's magic name makes Quadriga world famous

The strange story with the Quadriga award for Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin will be best remembered for the fact that the little-known prize has become world famous. It all happened just because of Mr. Putin. To be more precise, Putin has not taken part in the story. It was his name that made the whole story happen.

The award was founded by public organization Werkstatt Deutschland (Workshop Germany) in 2003. According to the organization, the winners of the award have the "spirit of the pioneer" and a desire for "public good."

It was originally decided to give the award for 2011 to Russia's PM Putin. Putin's opponents immediately started saying that it was a small and insignificant award. However, as soon as it was said that neither Putin, nor other laureates were going to receive the award this year, the prize immediately became a very prestigious one, almost like the Nobel Prize. It is amazing how quick evolution can happen: there is only a week between insignificance and prestige.

The news about the decision to give the Quadriga award to Putin caused quite a reaction on the part of his opponents. To be more precise, they went hysterical. The members of the board of trustees of the award began to refuse from their seats one after another. Cem Ozdemir, the co-chairman of the German Green party and Jimmy Wales, the founder of Wikipedia, as well as several other people resigned from their seats to protest the decision to honor Putin. Italy's Corriere della Sera wrote that the ex-president of the Czech Republic, Vaclav Havel, a former dissident, who won the prize in 2009, also stood up against honoring his "old-time enemy." The newspaper did not specify, though, when exactly Putin managed to become an old-time enemy to Mr. Havel.

As a result, the board of trustees of the award decided to cancel the prize for this year. The award will thus be withdrawn from Russia's PM Putin, Mexico's Foreign Minister Patricia Espinosa, German teacher and writer of Turkish origin Betul Durmaz and the Prime Minister of the Palestinian Authority Salam Fayyad.

The prize has stirred quite a controversy. Many people in Europe and Russia were previously unaware of its existence. Now they all know that there is such an award in Germany as Quadriga. The award became that famous only because of Putin. Previously, the prize was awarded to such historical figures as German Chancellor Helmut Kohl and Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev. Ukraine's ex-President Viktor Yushchenko and Serbian President Boris Tadic, Shimon Peres and Jose Manuel Barroso used to be the laureates of the prize before. However, such names have never made Quadriga a recognizable award.

Nowadays, the prize has finally become world-famous. Will it be an advantage, though? It seems that the board of trustees of the prize do not have any principles at all if they reverse their decision like that.

Vyacheslav Nikonov, the President of Polity Foundation (Moscow) told Pravda.Ru that Putin himself did not need the prize at all. According to Nikonov, the whole story about the prize is nothing but a small German fight.

"There are people in Germany who believe that Putin is a politician who deserves top honors and awards. There are Germans, who, like many Russian human rights activists believe, that Putin is the man, who launched an attack against democratic freedoms in Russia. We could witness this little German fight now. There is nothing else hidden behind it," Nikonov told Pravda.Ru.

Dmitry Peskov, Putin's press secretary, said that the situation with the Quadriga award would not affect the relations between Russia and Germany. Indeed, it would be strange to stake the friendly relations between the two countries just because some people in Germany dislike the Russian prime minister. Such sentiments will be preserved for good, no matter who stays in power in Russia.

Saturday, 16 July 2011

In Ukraine, Churches With A Distinctive Allure

IN western Ukraine, the side of the highway offers more unusual scenes than many performance-art pieces. On one spring day, an old woman cradled what looked like a baby but was actually a newborn lamb dressed in baby clothes.On another day, a young woman strutted down a dirt road in a micro-mini and precarious heels. Nearby, a pair of young dandies cruised in an ox cart.

But I wasn’t driving the back roads of Eastern Europe for the people-and-lamb-watching. As I rounded a corner, the dense forests of the Carpathian foothills opened up to reveal my goal: a tall bell tower, leaning slightly askew, crowned with a furlike layer of wooden shingles and topped with an Eastern Orthodox cross. I parked, grabbed my camera and set off for a closer look.

Zakarpattia, the western region of Ukraine that abuts eastern Slovakia and northeastern Hungary, is home to a number of unusual wooden churches dating from the 15th to 18th centuries.

After years of neglect, the churches — rough-hewn, idiosyncratic wooden structures with surprisingly tall spires — seem to be in danger of disappearing.

“They’re like fantastic dinosaurs, covered with wooden shingles that look like scales, which hide them in the fir trees,” said Olena Krushynska, who started a project to promote and protect the churches, when I called her a couple of weeks before my trip to ask for advice about visiting the region. “You will not see something like that in other countries — nowhere.”

Folk architecture and odd roadside scenes aren’t the only intriguing things about Zakarpattia, also known as Carpathian Ruthenia.

Its rolling hills and dark forests are believed to have been the inspiration for the mythical kingdom of Ruritania in Anthony Hope’s 1894 novel, “The Prisoner of Zenda.”

Even by European standards, Zakarpattia’s back story is rather remarkable: once part of Austria-Hungary, it became part of independent Czechoslovakia after World War I, then part of Ukraine and the U.S.S.R. after World War II.

The area is also believed to have been the only province of the Soviet Union that was ever governed by an American, Gregory Zatkovich, an ethnic Rusyn — or Ruthenian — from Pittsburgh who was appointed governor in 1920 when the region was still part of Czechoslovakia.

So last spring, after hearing so many strange stories, I decided to make a trip in search of the churches, driving from Hungary as part of a longer journey from my home in Prague.
Leaving the comfortable European Union as I headed into Ukraine, I thought the border felt militarized, even tense, with an invasive car search and inspection unlike anything I’d seen in Europe.

Also unlike the European Union: the roads. Driving north from the Hungarian border, it was not so much that the road had potholes, but rather that the potholes had only the slightest bit of road left to stitch them together, requiring numerous lurches from side to side as I tried to make my way forward.

Eventually, however, I found myself in the dark mountains, stopping when I saw a church in the hamlet of Izki.

As with a few of the churches I’d seen on Ms. Krushynska’s Web site, the tower of this church had been partly covered in tin, and the entrance had something like a front porch that was enclosed in glass.

The doors were open, and I walked in to find an elderly couple cleaning up, the babushka sweeping briskly at the threadbare carpet with a broom.

The altar was lovingly decorated with religious icons painted on wood panels, some charmingly naïve, some quite accomplished.

It would have felt more vibrant, I imagined, during church services, when a full congregation would chase away the chill of a cold day.

The old woman finished her sweeping and explained, as close as I could tell, that I could attend services at the wooden church in Bukovets, a nearby town, the next day.

I checked into a hotel in the nearby larger town of Volovets, where I awoke early, then drove through the mountains.

Even in mid-April, the weather was surprisingly brisk, and snow flurries were falling as I drove along the emerald Repynka River.

My GPS unit had thrown up its hands after the Hungarian border, declaring all of Ukraine terra incognita, and without satellite navigation the 12-mile drive seemed to take a long time.

Along the way I passed villages that looked like open-air museums: dozens of perfect log cabins without a trace of modern construction nearby. I saw eagles swoop from far above to land near the water.
Eventually my map led me to a settlement where I stopped to ask a villager for directions to Bukovets. He smiled and pointed farther on up the road.

A few minutes later, I saw a small wooden structure that could have been a cabin or even a farm shed if not for the soaring spire on top.

As tiny as it might be, plenty of people were already in the church, and I took a place in the back as the services started.

The language was impossible to understand, but the building itself communicated in a clear vernacular: thick columns, coarsely hewn and partly painted white, were topped with gold-haloed icons and lovely scarves that must have been embroidered by hand.

The ceiling in the back was only an arm’s breadth above my head, but on the other side of the crowd of kerchief-capped heads the space opened up, with a golden chandelier hanging down from the tall ceiling.

The building was obviously hundreds of years old; it practically felt as if it were alive, and I felt a chill as the congregation began singing the familiar words of the Kyrie eleison, an important prayer in Eastern Christian liturgy.

After the service, I headed south, passing by the town of Mizhhiria, where I discovered the second logistical problem with my road trip: the Ukrainian police.

Pulled over by a plump, pink-faced officer, I was told that I had been speeding and that I would need to pay a fine of 100 hryvnia. I would not, he said, receive a ticket or any form of receipt or paperwork.

I thought of arguing, then realized two things: first, that this would require extensive communication beyond my skills at charades, and second, that the amount that he was asking for was about $12.


After he took the money, the officer smiled grandly, offering me a fleshy handshake.

Fortunately, I missed any further encounters with the police: the road soon became so bad that speeding was impossible, to say nothing of normal driving.
By the time I passed the dusty town of Vinogradiv, I was exhausted, and as I swerved from side to side up another hill, an old man in a flat cap on the hilltop above waved, while his small herd of underweight cows grazed.

Soon I came to the village of Novoselytsia.

High overhead, the wooden spire had a walled-in platform that looked as if it could accommodate a brigade of archers just as well as it could bell-ringers.

At its base was a roofed fence surrounding a small lawn. The gate, however, was locked, and I could only peer in hopefully from the outside.

A few minutes later, a broad-shouldered young man walked up the road with a big smile.

He was, he said, the mayor of Novoselytsia, and he spoke enough Slovak to understand my Czech. The church was not open, he said, but he would try to find someone to open it.

A few minutes later, he returned with a sad shake of his head, offering a small amulet apparently made by schoolchildren as an apology. It had an image of the spire on it, and was dated from 2009.

“It is beautiful, isn’t it?” he asked, pointing at the church.

I told him it was, adding that they were lucky to have such history and culture in Novoselytsia, but he corrected me.

“This isn’t our culture,” he said. “This is everyone’s culture. It belongs to the world.”

He said that the church had spectacular murals and icons, all original, hundreds of years old, and I simply had to come back again to see them when the church was open.

I thought about the bad roads and the Ukrainian policemen, about the stress of crossing the border — not even knowing that getting back would involve a four-hour wait at customs the next day — and, weighing it all, I told him I would.

Sunday, 13 March 2011

At The Ancient City Of Kamyanets-Podilskiy, The Wall's The Thing

KAMYANETS-PODILSKIJ, Ukraine -- Looking across the gaping stone canyon at the ancient walled city of Kamyanets-Podilskiy in southwestern Ukraine, you can imagine what it must have felt like to ride up to this place at the head of an invading horde.
It would have been a sinking feeling, as deep as the gorge in front of you.

The old city is almost entirely enclosed by the canyon created by a loop of the Smotrych River. To get to the town, you would have to lead your men straight down a rock face more than 100 feet high, then across the river, which would have been flooded, thanks to some ingenious dams.

If you managed to get to the far bank, you would have to scramble up another cliff. Even without the people inside shooting at you, your horde would be pretty grumpy when you got to the top. Oh, and then you'd be facing the city walls. ("One of you knuckleheads did remember to bring the ladder, didn't you?")

The other option would be to advance across the narrow isthmus at the mouth of the loop. But that was defended by a massive stone behemoth that looked like something out of a very dark legend - all turrets, gun ports and towers.

The walls are still there today, but now this enchanting city welcomes tourists. And if you want to get inside the ancient fortress, all you need is a ticket that costs less than $2.

Nobody knows when people first used this natural citadel to hold enemies at bay, but it was certainly occupied by the 11th century. Mongols overran the city in about 1240. After that, the defenses were stiffened.

The older of the two fortresses that guard the main approach to the town began to take shape in the 14th century. Its walls are 45 feet high and almost 15 feet thick. In 1621, a second fortress of massive earthen walls was built in front of the Old Fortress.

Over the years, the fortifications have repelled more than 50 assaults and sieges. According to legend, when the Turkish Sultan Osman arrived at the city in 1621, he asked who had created such a forbidding stronghold. "It was created by Allah himself," came the answer. "Well then, let Allah storm it," the sultan responded, before withdrawing.

The fortress has rarely been taken by direct attack.In 1393, a Lithuanian prince conquered the city thanks to dissension in the ranks of the defenders. And in 1672, a Turkish army outnumbered the garrison by a ratio of 60 to 1. After the city fell, Mehmed IV supposedly trampled looted icons as he rode into town.

You can clamber over the remains of the New Fortress without a ticket. Inside the Old Fortress, you'll get an idea of what life was like for the soldiers, see the hole where debtors were flung if they couldn't pay their bills, and examine the well in one of the castle towers from which soldiers hauled up water using a device that looks like a giant hamster wheel.

It may come as something of a surprise that such a massive and well-preserved bastion stands in Ukraine. But if Mesopotamia is the cradle of civilization, the lands of present-day Ukraine are probably the cradle of conquest.

Much of the land is rich and flat, perfect for farming and war. Scythian, Mongol, Tartar, Cossack, Russian, Polish, Turkish, Lithuanian, Austrian, Hungarian, Swedish, English, Greek and German armies have all come this way.

Which is why people in Ukraine have spent a lot of time building walls. The country holds more than 300 citadels and castles. They range from walled monasteries along the Dnieper River to Genoese towers on the Black Sea, built to guard trading outposts.

Kamyanets-Podilskiy is one of the most impressive. The old part of the city - in the oxbow of the river - is not much more than half a mile long and is full of old buildings and historic churches. We hired an English-speaking guide for a 2 1/2-hour walking tour for about $20.

Wandering the cobbled streets, you can see the Windy Gate (remembered as the place where a breeze had the audacity to pluck off Peter the Great's hat in 1711) and the partially reconstructed Polish Gate, which guards a ford in the river.

There's the old city hall, which now houses three small museums, and the ruins of a 15th-century Armenian church. The facade of the Cathedral of Sts. Peter and Paul cradles a 17th-century minaret built when the Turks ruled the city.

When the Poles got the town back by treaty in 1699, they decided not to knock it down, but topped it with an 11-foot golden statue of the Virgin Mary.

Signs in Ukrainian and English point the way to the main attractions.

Several hotels have opened in the old city and several more are in the new city within easy walking distance. We stayed in one across the river, a 10-minute walk from the historic district.

The old city suffered heavy damage during World War II. Many of the drab postwar buildings have recently been replaced with modern buildings that look as if they could have been built centuries ago.

Locals, such as Ukrainian castle expert Iryna Pustynnikova, find this quite disappointing, because drawings of what the old city looked like could have guided authentic restorations.

Local authorities opted for plans more likely to attract investors. I didn't find the new stuff offensively Disneyish, but more discerning people might.

For centuries, the city had a remarkably diverse population - Poles, Ukrainians, Russians, Jews, Armenians. But with Soviet rule came many deportations. And the Nazi occupation during WWII was followed by terrible massacres. More than 23,000 Jews were killed near the city in three days in August 1941.

That incident is not prominently mentioned in tours of the city, but it is the one that came back to me as I wandered the ancient fortifications.

Today, we see such ramparts as quaint architectural marvels, almost like something from a fairy tale. But people built them out of fear - because conquerors exact a terrible price.

Wednesday, 25 August 2010

Russification Of Ukraine Renewed

The law making Russian an official language of law proceedings in Ukraine is not only unconstitutional, it is yet another step in the renewal of the russification of Ukraine that this new government has embarked upon.
The ruling Party of Regions claim they are making Ukraine compliant with the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages (ECRML). That is a most hollow claim.

The ECRML is designed specifically for “the protection of the historical regional or minority languages of Europe, some of which are in danger of eventual extinction”, none of which applies to the Russian language in Ukraine.

According to the 2001 census, 67.5 percent of the population declared Ukrainian as their native language and 29.6 percent declared Russian. That percentage already exceeds the number of ethnic Russians in Ukraine, which is 17.3 %, compared with 77.8 Ukrainians and 4.9 % others.

Ethnic Russians form 56% of the total Russian-speaking population, while the remaining Russophones are people of other ethnic background: 5,545,000 Ukrainians, 172,000 Belarusians, 86,000 Jews, 81,000 Greeks, 62,000 Bulgarians, 46,000 Moldavians, 43,000 Tartars, 43,000 Armenians, 22,000 Poles, 21,000 Germans, and 15,000 Crimean Tartars.

Furthermore, that number does not even reflect the actual usage of Russian in everyday life. According to a 2004 public opinion poll by the Kyiv International Sociology Institute, Russian is used at home by 43–46% of the population of the country (in other words a similar proportion to Ukrainian).

By regions, this accounts for 86.8% of the population in the east, 82.3% in the south and 46.9% in the east-centre. Russian language also dominates in both print and electronic media. The Ukrainian state subsidizes nearly 3,000 Russian schools. That’s discrimination?

Under Russian rule successive governments attempted to eradicate the Ukrainian language. The Russian Minister of Internal Affairs Pyotr Valuev in 1863 issued a secret decree that banned the publication of religious texts and educational texts written in Ukrainian.

This ban was expanded by Tsar Alexander II with the Ems Ukaz of 1876 which prohibited all Ukrainian language books and song lyrics as well as the importation of such works. Under the USSR, the Ukrainian language was not officially banned, but certainly frowned upon, suffered russification, and its usage declined.

If the PRU is so concerned about minority linguistic rights, why don’t they turn to their masters in the Kremlin? While, as noted earlier, Kyiv pays for 3,000 Russian schools in Ukraine, Russia doesn’t even pay for one to serve its 3-5 million strong Ukrainian minority (depending on official or unofficial figures).

Recent articles in Window on Eurasia, by analyst Paul Goble outlined some of the glaring discrepancies between Russian education in Ukraine and Ukrainian education in Russia. In Ukraine, 1.3 million children are studying Russian; but in Russia, only 205 are studying Ukrainian, a number so low that it can only involve students at a school attached to the Ukrainian embassy.

Ukraine currently publishes 1.5 million Russian-language textbooks and 125,000 Russian-Ukrainian dictionaries each year, whereas the Russian Federation government is not paying for the publication of a single copy of a Ukrainian-language book for students in that country. Furthermore, Moscow is seeking to suppress Ukrainian cultural organizations in Russia.

Because the Ukrainian language was threatened with extinction in its own homeland through Russian policies, it was necessary to provide the bare minimum of security for its continuation.

Frankly, existing Ukrainian language legislation is already toothless. So what’s the problem? Is it unreasonable to expect a minority to learn the language of the country they are living in, while preserving their own? Or do they really expect their own to dominate at the expense of the native language?

This is not therefore a matter of minority rights – but of minority rule, much as was the case in Apartheid-era South Africa.

Sunday, 2 May 2010

Mayakovsky`s Moscow

Vladimir Mayakovsky, avant-garde poet, painter and revolutionary, committed suicide 80 years ago. No one knows exactly why, on April 14, 1930, he chose to shoot himself in his small room at the top of an apartment block in Lubyanka.

Although he left an unfinished poem describing how "love's boat smashed against daily life", conspiracy theories involving Russian roulette and NKVD agents proliferated. You can still visit the room where he lived and died as part of the Mayakovsky House, one of the most extraordinary museums in Moscow. Here and in other places around the city, you can celebrate the colourful life of a writer whose journey from teenage activism to disillusionment and despair seems like a parable of early 20th century Russia.

Sunday, 4 April 2010

Yanukovych Sees 'Cultural Autonomy' For Ukraine's Regions - Official

KIEV, Ukraine -- Ukraine's new government will give "broad cultural autonomy" to the country's regions, including to choose the main language used in local government and schools, the president's deputy chief of staff said.
Anna Herman said in an article published on Saturday in the weekly newspaper Zerkalo Nedeli that Ukraine must be tolerant of the fact that different parts of the country have different values, which should not be promoted across the whole country.

"This must be the new ideology of the Ukrainian state, based on principles of wide cultural autonomy for the regions, with the right to choose a language of communication that meets the needs of the majority of inhabitants, to erect memorials to the heroes whose memory lives in their hearts," she said, balancing the language issue with the desire of some in western Ukraine to honor nationalists who fought against the Soviets, particularly during World War II.

"Delegating the right to define cultural policies to local governments will remove the existing tension in this area," Herman said.

Ukraine's president, Viktor Yanukovych, was elected in February on the back of strong support in the largely Russian-speaking south and east of the country, but was less popular in the more nationalist west.

He has said that he would like to make Russian a second state language, but the balance of power in the country makes it unlikely that any political force could secure the votes in parliament necessary to change the constitution.

The governing coalition, led by Yanukovych's Party of Regions, is therefore likely to incorporate the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages into Ukrainian law, which would allow individual regions to use Russian - or other widely spoken languages - for official communication and schooling.

Yanukovych's election sparked fears that he would seek to align Ukraine too closely with Russia, but he has been careful to court the European Union as well, and the language policies are being promoted as part of a wider platform of tolerance.

A deputy prime minister said on Wednesday that as part of efforts to create an atmosphere of tolerance the authorities would not block any marches held on Victory Day by veterans of the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA), which fought on the side of the Nazis in World War II.

"I think such parades will take place in western regions. We will not ban anything," Volodymyr Seminozhenko said, adding that the government would not let things get out of hand.

The UPA is at the center of another thorny issue for the new president.

After losing in the first round of this year's presidential elections, then-President Viktor Yushchenko awarded the Hero of Ukraine honor to Stepan Bandera, a UPA leader who called on Ukrainians "to help the German army in the fight against Moscow and Bolshevism."

The Soviet authorities accused Bandera, who fought both the Nazis and the Soviets in his quest for an independent Ukraine, of numerous acts of murder and terrorism. He was assassinated by the KGB in Munich, Germany, on October 15, 1959.

The award was strongly protested in the Russian-leaning east of the country, and on Friday a court in Donetsk ruled that the award was illegal. Yanukovych has said the issue will be settled before the country celebrates Victory Day on May 9, and following the court decision calls for him to withdraw the award intensified.

Sunday, 7 March 2010

Nationalists hold rally in Kiev to defend Ukrainian language

Ukrainian nationalist association Svoboda (Freedom) is holding a rally in the ex-Soviet state's capital Kiev to defend the Ukrainian language, a RIA Novosti correspondent reported Sunday.

"After Viktor Yanukovych was elected Ukraine's president, the threat to the Ukrainian language has multiplied," Andriy Mohnik, a deputy head of Svoboda, said while opening the several-dozen-strong rally.

Yanukovych , sworn in February 25 following the February 7 presidential election runoff which he narrowly won from then prime minister Yulia Tymoshenko, has a friendly attitude to Russia and the Russian language rather than his predecessor Viktor Yushchenko whose pro-Western policies, including a bid to take Ukraine into NATO, saw a rapid deterioration in bilateral ties.

The new Ukrainian leader, whose power base is in the mainly Russian-speaking eastern and southern industrial parts of the country, has pledged to take steps to assure the right of Ukrainians to speak Russian, something his predecessor had suppressed.

Yanukovych has vowed to restore the damaged ties with Russia and in particular consider extending the Russian navy base's stay in the country, as well as to set up a natural gas consortium to deter fresh disputes affecting transits to Europe.

Rally speakers said Sunday they would try to prevent the new president from canceling Yushchenko's decree to heroize onetine Nazi collaborator Stepan Bandera.

Yanukovych said after Friday's talks with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev in Moscow that the controversy over his predecessor naming Bandera a national hero would be settled before this year's Victory Day.

Bandera's Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists briefly allied with Nazi Germany during the 1941 invasion of the Soviet Union. The Soviet authorities accused Bandera, who fought both the Nazis and the Soviets in his quest for an independent Ukraine, of numerous acts of murder and terrorism. He was assassinated by the KGB in Munich, Germany, on October 15, 1959.

Saturday, 13 February 2010

Bolshoi to close – and open again

Another Bolshoi in town needs to close its doors for renovation. The Bolshoi Zal of the Moscow Conservatoire, which celebrated its centenary in 2001, is long overdue for repair work.
Although slated to close its doors several times since 2002, the hall is still open, trying to raise the funds needed for the job.
Numerous musicians have joined the effort to raise money for the renovations, and on Feb. 2 the fund-raising got a big boost from artists of the highest calibre. Valery Gergiyev found time to stop by for a quick concert at the Bolshoi Zal, and had Denis Matsuyev fly in from France to play with him.
Matsuyev played Rachmaninov's "Variations on a Theme by Paganini". There are probably not many pianists who can play Rachmaninov with this much ease, but Matsuyev, as a child, must have been the kind of kid who ripped open his Christmas presents as soon as he got them. In his music there was no delicious suspense, no expectant pause or delicate anticipation; he went through the subtle harmonies of Rachmaninov like a fist through wrapping paper.
Over the coming months, there will be several such charity concerts at the Bolshoi Zal. The next concert will be on Feb. 17, when renowned choir-conductor Boris Tevlin will lead the State Academic Russian Choir and perform a programme of Russian and Soviet choir music, including Taneev and Rachmaninov.
Bolshoi opens ... again
Feb. 2 saw one of the halls at the Bolshoi Theatre opened for its first concert after restorations. The choir hall welcomed an array of distinguished guests, including Mayor Yury Luzhkov, who listened to artists of the Bolshoi Theatre perform in the historical hall.
"I hope this can be seen as a symbolic return of life to our theatre," said Anatoly Iksanov, the general director of the theatre.Plans call for the Round and Beethoven halls to be restored by the end of March and the façade of the building to be completed by Victory Day.

Tuesday, 29 December 2009

Uplifting Tale of Leningrad Siege Wins Booker

Yelena Chizhova is the first St. Petersburg novelist to win the Russian Booker Prize in the 17-year history of the country’s most prestigious independent literary prize with her novel “A Time of Women.”
The novel looks at the consequences of the 900-day Siege of Leningrad during World War II. The siege is the setting for the lives of three women who are the novel’s central protagonists. Two of them have lost everything: their husbands, children and parents. The third, although much younger, is also deeply touched by the war.
Chizhova was given the prize at an awards ceremony earlier this month. Her victory was not entirely unexpected as she was short-listed twice before. The work is very much in line with Chizhova’s previous four novels, all of which focus on dramatic moments in history.
Andrei Ariyev, editor of the St. Petersburg literary journal Zvezda, which published “A Time of Women” in its pages and nominated it for the competition, said at a gathering to celebrate the victory last week that “A Time of Women” corresponds to Alexander Pushkin’s definition of the novel as “a historic epoch presented in the form of literary narration.”
In an interview, Chizhova said she based the novel’s central stories on what she heard from her grandmothers and others of their generation. The book produces a collective image of manifold suffering: those who remained in the city throughout the siege, those who were evacuated via Lake Ladoga, the many who were killed in the bombing and those who came back to live in the harsh poverty that followed the war.
Nevertheless, the author shows the misery indirectly, and a mood of tolerance and love prevails in the narrative. The technique of the composition is complex. It is narrated by an authorial voice into which extracts from the younger girl’s diary are inserted, providing the perspective of a 6-year-old.
Life proceeds on several levels. It is in the communal flat where the three women live, outside in the streets, in a church, at a factory, in food lines, in their conversations where they talk about their past, the years before the Revolution, their lives during the siege and the years of war; and then in the girl’s head, as she listens to all this, absorbing everything and then recording her impressions in her diary and drawings.
At first it seems that fate has been cruelest to the two older women, who are in their 50s, because they have lost all those who are dearest to them. They have seen better times and can compare them with the present. Antonina, on the other hand, is a representative of the younger, postwar generation. Her life is one of overwhelming poverty and hunger. She raises her 6-year-old mute daughter on her own and lives in permanent fear that Sofia will be taken away from her and put in a state institution for handicapped children.
Sofia has no father and lives in extreme poverty, but she is the recipient of so much love that her childhood might easily be envied. The two older women, her neighbors, bestow their love upon her, standing in for both her parents when Antonina dies. Despite all this gloom, Chizhova manages to take readers away from the darkness and raise them up to the sky.
The girl grows up, enrolling in the Arts Academy, and we follow her life into the 1970s as the novel touches on issues such as emigration. Sofia hesitates as she faces the dilemma of whether to leave the Soviet Union and start a new life or stay near the graves of her loved ones. She feels that leaving them behind would be a betrayal. She stays to be with the souls of those who loved her so much knowing that they would have sacrificed their own lives for her without a moment’s hesitation.
Russia has not given us much in the way of uplifting and optimistic novels in recent years and the Booker has repeatedly been criticized for being clubby, remote and giving the award to books that no one reads. This year St. Petersburg has turned the page.

Sunday, 27 December 2009

Rostropovich Fest Brings Best of Classical to Baku

Azerbaijan’s capital, Baku, played host to the third in a series of annual music festivals earlier this month honoring one of the city’s most distinguished native sons, cellist and conductor Mstislav Rostropovich.
Rostropovich was born to a musical family in Baku on March 27, 1927, his father, Leopold, a renowned cellist and professor at the Baku Conservatory, his mother, Sofia, a talented pianist.
“My father lived in Baku only until he was four, but he always loved the city,” daughter Olga Rostropovich, director of the festival and president of the Mstislav Rostropovich Foundation, said during a conversation just prior to the festival’s closing concert. “He came to Baku to conduct,” she continued, “and was forever trying to improve the musical situation, making it his business to see that the orchestra here was provided with better instruments and received better salaries. He also wished to create a festival the likes of which Baku had never seen before.”
Rostropovich fulfilled his wish a little more than a year before his death in April 2007 by bringing an impressive array of fellow musicians to Baku for a week of concerts commemorating the 100th anniversary of the birth of his close friend and mentor, Dmitry Shostakovich.
Present-day Baku, is a handsome, bustling, oil-rich metropolis of just above 2 million inhabitants, boasting an array of luxury boutiques that easily rival Moscow’s and clubs that are alleged to rank the city among the world’s 10 leading centers of nightlife.
When it comes to classical music, however, Baku lies off the beaten track of touring soloists and ensembles. It took considerable effort, therefore, plus strong support from the Azeri government and the foundation bearing the name of the country’s first president, Heydar Aliyev, to bring to the city an assembly of musical talent from around the globe as extraordinary as that which appeared at this year’s Rostropovich festival. For the most part, the performances that resulted were of a quality to make even a jaded Moscow concert-goer sit up and take notice.
The festival’s opening concert, however, relied for its music not on imported talent but on Baku’s own Azerbaijan State Symphony Orchestra, which played quite superbly under the baton of its long-time music director, Rauf Abdullayev. Featured on the brief program was a fascinating array of works by half a dozen Azeri composers, all of which seemed in some degree to spring from Azerbaijan’s rich store of folk music.
Following intermission on opening night came a very special tribute to Rostropovich, with the showing of an hour-long film from U.S. television network CBS documenting his return to the Soviet Union in 1990, together with his equally famous soprano wife, Galina Vishnevskaya, following the couple’s 16-year-long enforced exile abroad. Besides marking each step of the joyous weeklong homecoming, the film also captured the extraordinary spirit of the time, when everything seemed possible, including, most of all, that the Soviet Union might transform itself into a very different sort of country.
The soloist on the festival’s second evening was Lithuanian-born cellist David Geringas, a prize pupil of Rostropovich and winner of a gold medal at the 1970 Tchaikovsky Competition, who managed to bring clarity to the knotty solo passages of Shostakovich’s Cello Concert No. 1, of a sort perhaps heard only in the remembered performances of his great mentor.
On the evening that followed, young Azeri native Murad Adigezalzadeh provided truly virtuoso pianism in Sergei Prokofiev’s Piano Concert No. 2, and was splendidly accompanied by Moscow’s Novaya Rossia Orchestra, under the baton of Romanian conductor Christian Badea, who went on to lead the first-ever performance of Shostakovich’s Symphony No. 10 that, in my experience, actually generated excitement.
On stage for the next two festival evenings was London’s superb English Chamber Orchestra, first with famed Israeli-born violinist Pinchas Zukerman as conductor and soloist in some stylishly played music of Joseph Haydn and Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, and then (in a concert that brief illness forced me to miss) under the baton of its principal conductor, Paul Watkins.
The festival’s final concert proved unexpectedly exciting. Leading the Azerbaijan State Symphony in the music of Ludwig van Beethoven was Maxim Vengerov, known far and wide as a supreme virtuoso of the violin but in recent seasons turning to the podium as the result of a shoulder problem. It is good to know that the problem has now been overcome and Vengerov will soon be playing again. But considering how incisively he dispatched Beethoven’s Egmont Overture, Triple Concerto — with three excellent young soloists, including Taiwanese-Australian violinist Ray Chen, who last summer took first prize in the hugely prestigious Queen Elizabeth of Belgium Competition — and Symphony No. 5, Vengerov seems likely before long to be pursuing as acclaimed a conducting career as the one that he has already forged at the violin.

Saturday, 26 December 2009

Visiting Kiev, The Capital Of Ukraine And A Cradle Of Russian Culture

KIEV, Ukraine -- Some cities are love at first sight. People fall for Paris in the taxi from the airport. Others take you slowly. Kiev is like that.
I've walked the streets of this Ukrainian capital almost every day for a year. I've watched white-tailed eagles on a vast swampy island in the middle of the Dnieper River, listened as unseen nuns filled a vaulted church with their harmonies, marveled at the parade of tall women in stilettos clicking confidently down icy sidewalks and suffered a mild concussion myself when my feet shot out from under me in a frozen alley.I've passed markers commemorating millions of murders. I've negotiated for a baggie of turmeric with a man from Samarkand. I've lost my bearings in candlelit catacombs, felt the sting of the winter wind on the city's high bluffs, watched twilight envelop golden-domed churches and talked to the genius behind the city's strangest museum. (And I'm not talking about the toilet museum, either.)I've discovered wooden windmills, taxi-driver poets, gilded icons, robed monks, blues singers, cheap river cruises, horseradish vodka and a few new things about myself. Perhaps the only thing I haven't encountered in Kiev is a dull day. It is an unsung capital, full of surprises. During the day, you may be startled by the sudden cascade of sound that tumbles out of churches on religious holidays -- the "raspberry bells," it's called. By night, you may flinch at the concussion of the boisterous fireworks that Ukrainians send arcing over the city four or five nights a month.Sixteen months ago, I walked away from my desk at The Post. Shortly afterward, my wife landed an 18-month job in Ukraine.We arrived on a fall day as the sun was setting and had our first meal at Oscar's Place, a three-table restaurant on the street where we'd be living. My wife, who speaks Russian, told the barmaid that it was my first night in Ukraine. Don't order, she replied. I'll bring you real Ukrainian food. She did. And it was great, though the first dish -- salo, slices of raw pork fat served on black bread -- is best if washed down with vodka.Since then, I've been spending the afternoons writing and exploring the city and the mornings studying Russian. (Almost everybody in Kiev speaks both Russian and Ukrainian. I picked Russian because I've always dreamed of reading Chekhov in his native tongue.)I began with a seven-word vocabulary: Yes, no, please, thank you, hello, goodbye and beer ("peevo"). That was enough to get started. People I met were happy to communicate. Gestures and pantomime worked wonders when words failed. I found myself thinking: I doubt this would work with the French.To my chagrin, I found that people sometimes addressed me in English before I opened my mouth. Was it my clothes? No, I was usually wearing black jeans and a black pullover, like every other man in town. Shoes? In Washington, I could always spot tourists by their shoes. But my low black boots were exactly what many Ukrainians had on. Finally I asked. Turned out, it was my face.I never thought I looked American, but apparently I do, at least in Slavic countries. Most people here have better cheekbones than Tom Cruise. I don't.Tragedy and rebirthKiev is an old city, one of the cradles of Russian culture. The Russians, in fact, call it the mother of cities. Legend has it that in A.D. 560, three Viking brothers rowed down the Dnieper with their sister at the steering oar. She picked the spot where they settled and named it for the eldest brother, Kyi. Sounds like she was in charge.Although Kiev is spread out along both sides of the Dnieper, I generally walk the oldest sections, which are scattered along the hills of the west bank. The golden domes of churches, monasteries and bell towers adorn the ridge above the river, as if some giant had dropped a handful of Christmas decorations.The center of Kiev remains a remarkably intimate place for a big city (2.7 million). Not many high rises. Lots of quirky streets and eccentric apartment buildings festooned with sculptural reliefs -- lions here, gods and goddesses there, laurel wreaths above the windows. There's a concrete rhino poking out of one building. And in some sections, the facades are frosted with a layer of ceramic tile.If you squint past the drab Soviet architecture that mars some of the city, you can see enormous beauty. But there is sadness in it. People used to say that New Orleans was "the city that care forgot." Nobody ever said that about Kiev.Everywhere, you sense layers of tragedy and rebirth. The churches of Kiev make the point. Near our flat, you can find the remains of a church destroyed by invaders in the 13th century. A few hundred yards away, on the same hilltop, stands St. Michael's Monastery of the Golden Domes, home to my favorite bells. A church has been on that spot for more than 900 years, but today's lovely cerulean building is a recent reconstruction of an old church that communists blew up in the 1930s.The nearby streets include ornate pre-Soviet facades and a few cold examples of Stalinist gigantism. You meet many self-congratulatory statues but scads of modest, carefully sculpted portraits, too. They're easy to miss. Most jut just above eye level from the sides of old apartment buildings.Each shows a distinguished painter or agronomist or writer or ballet master . . . who had an apartment in the building the memorial is bolted to. As you walk along, you think of the aging physicist skittering across a frozen curb here or the lovely actress memorizing lines from "Uncle Vanya" on a park bench just there.On one of my earliest walks, not far from our flat, I found a small stone sculpture of the silhouette of a child inside the outline of a robed woman, perhaps an angel. It commemorates the Great Famine of 1932-33. Unlike most famines, this one was man-made. Ultimately, the man who made it was Stalin.He demanded impossible amounts of grain for export. Desperate to comply, local bosses kept supplies of grain locked in warehouses while Ukrainians starved. Estimates of the death toll range from 2.5 million to nearly 10 million. It was mostly ignored in the West.Children suffered terribly. Some people survived by eating corpses. Standing in the wind in front of the memorial and feeling very small, I tried to grasp the enormity of it.Perhaps because my great-grandfather Capt. Frank C. Robbins fought there, I think about the carnage of Gettysburg, one of the bloodiest battles of America's bloodiest war. Seven thousand died at Gettysburg, so -- assuming that 5 million died -- Ukraine's Great Famine killed more than 700 Gettysburgs.The worst of the famine was not here in Kiev, but in villages. But walking down the city's lovely old streets, passing people whose families almost all endured the famine, you can't help admiring the grit and grace of Ukrainians.Ukrainians don't get a lot of respect from Westerners. Theirs is the largest country in Europe, save for the European part of Russia. Ukraine was part of the Russian empire and then a republic within the Soviet Union. It became independent in 1991. A pro-Western government took over after the peaceful protests of the "Orange Revolution" of 2004. But a lot of Americans think it is still part of Russia. Someone in the United States sent a letter to a friend here addressed to "Kiev, Russia." It arrived.Green hills, broken heartsWhen I think of the city, the color that comes to mind is not orange but green. It's a very leafy place.A beautiful string of parks stretches along the hills above the river. It's probably the best walk in the city. Eventually, you reach the high-walled Kiev-Pechersk Lavra. Once one of the most important centers of Orthodox Christianity and home to 1,000 monks, it was taken over by the Soviet government in 1930. Religious activities resumed over time. Today, some buildings are secular cultural museums and some are part of a religious complex operated by the Orthodox Church.Beneath several of the churches is a labyrinth of tunnels, used by reclusive monks in times gone by and now the resting place for many saints. Carved into the 660 yards of stone tunnels are a number of tiny, elegant churches fitted with glittering gold icons. Parts of the cave complex are open to the public. For me, lighting a candle and walking through the cramped, whitewashed passages is both strange and moving. Along with tourists, devout worshipers come here to kneel and pray next to the small, glass-topped coffins.Part of the Lavra encompasses the secular exhibitions -- which run the gamut from displays of ornamental gold fashioned by the mysterious Scythian peoples who once ruled the Ukrainian steppe to the marvelously quirky Museum of Micro-Miniatures.The latter grew out of the imagination of one man, Mykola Syadristy, who set out to make items so tiny they could only be appreciated when viewed through microscopes. My favorite consists of a human hair, drilled hollow and then polished to transparency. Inside this tiny tube, Syadristy managed to insert a miniature rose.Now 72, Syadristy often hangs around the museum. His picture is on the wall, and it's easy to pick him out if he's there. One afternoon, my friend Karen, who speaks fluent Russian, and I struck up a conversation with him. We thought he would regale us with stories of his secret techniques -- how he made the minuscule maiden with an umbrella who sits on the proboscis of a life-size golden mosquito, or how he placed an entire desert caravan inside the eye of a needle.Our initial question produced an uninterruptible 15-minute oration, but it wasn't about how he put a chess set on the head of a pin. It was about Marx, Engels, Lenin and the shortcomings of Ukraine's current leadership.The more you talk to Ukrainians, the more you realize that for all their toughness, their hearts have been broken by politicians.President Viktor Yushchenko, who led the Orange Revolution, seemed poised to become the country's George Washington. But in the run-up to this winter's election, his approval rating is in the neighborhood of 2 to 3 percent, making him perhaps the world's most unpopular elected leader.Part of the reason is that the financial crisis that shook the United States has been catastrophic here. You wonder how much Ukrainians can take. Unemployment is up. The economy is sagging. People who have been sacked can't get at their savings because banks are in trouble.But you can walk the streets here and still see plenty of shiny cars threading their way around the rattling Russian-designed Ladas. On the sidewalks march Ukrainian women in glittering shoes and fur-trimmed leather jackets. On the outskirts, marshy fields erupt with hulking McMansions.It's as if Ukraine is somehow sure that its encounter with misfortune will have a storybook ending, an attitude captured in the local saying: If Khevrya hadn't fallen into the puddle, she wouldn't have gotten married. Although no handsome stranger has pulled Kiev out of the mud lately, people here have a profound understanding of misfortune.The reality of that hits home as you walk south from the old monastic citadel. The city falls away on either side and the view is dominated by Kiev's perhaps most dramatic landmark: Rodina Mat, the mother of the country.She is tall, she is titanium, she has a 53-ton sword, she is not particularly happy.The statue stands atop a museum dedicated to World War II's Eastern Front, and the story inside the museum is more than sobering. Moving through the museum, I often wonder why I knew so little of it until now.In history courses in high school and college, I got the standard American account of the war: Blitzkrieg, Dunkirk, Battle of Britain, Churchill with a defiant cigar, D-Day, pretty girls showering GIs with flowers in Paris, Battle of the Bulge, our tanks rumbling toward Hitler's bunker. Victory.Well, no.Walking through the museum made me want to learn more about the "Great Patriotic War" and the mammoth battles of the Eastern Front.In the United States, we revere my father's contemporaries as the "Greatest Generation." And their bravery and sacrifice is beyond question. But when the Greatest Generation handed down the story of the war in Europe, they often neglected to mention that it was the Red Army that broke Hitler's back.The Soviet losses were staggering. In 1941, at the First Battle of Kiev -- which I had never really heard of before I got here -- the Soviet army suffered 700,000 killed, wounded and captured. If you count German losses and civilian carnage, the figure approaches 1 million -- or 20 to 25 Gettysburgs, where 50,000 were killed or wounded. That's just one of the battles fought at Kiev. There were others.Then there's the secluded gully where in two days in September 1941, the victorious Germans shot 33,771 Jews. Executions of Jews, communists, partisans, gypsies and others continued at the Babi Yar ravine until 1943. A hundred thousand may have died there. Maybe more.The Soviets erected a grandiose marker in a nearby park in 1976 but didn't quite have room on the tablet to mention that the people shot to death were mostly Jews. Eventually a memorial in the shape of a menorah was built in the woods nearby, overlooking the lip of the ravine.Yet despite all this sadness and grief, there is wonder and splendor, too. Twist your way down the street known as St. Andrew's Descent, past the wedding-cake architecture of St. Andrew's Church and the tiny cafes clinging to the slope, and you can almost image you are seeing Kiev 100 years ago, when the great novelist Mikhail Bulgakov ("The Master and Margarita") lived and worked in a little house on the right.To find much of this charm, you must look around, or at least understand, the top layer of the city: the Soviet layer. It has a special grimness. Peeling back the layers of a place takes time. I was in Miami for 16 years and spent most of the time trying to figure out what was at the heart of it. It's a slippery place. I never got to the center, but I did figure out that the center wasn't very important. It was what was on the glittering surface that mattered.Kiev is the opposite, I think. Yes, it's a city with plenty of tricks. But it has been around for more than 14 centuries. Kiev knows who it is.The place where I feel the heart of Kiev most intensely is looking at the green and golden domes of St. Sophia's Cathedral. This building somehow survived the attack of Batu Khan and his Golden Horde in the 13th century. Down the street, the khan, grandson of Genghis Khan, burned down an even older church with 3,000 Kievans inside. St. Sophia's also survived the czars, the Bolshevik Revolution and Hitler. It survived Stalin's penchant for blowing churches to smithereens.Kievans tell of a legend that the call of the city's church bells can weave a shield over the city.Looking at them with my foreign eyes, I consider the centuries of faith here and think about being from a culture where a shield involves missiles or lasers.And it occurs to me that when I leave, the thing I will miss most of all will be the bells.

Tuesday, 1 December 2009

Ukrainian museum claims it owns a Titian portrait

The director of a Ukrainian museum claimed Tuesday that a portrait of a Venetian Doge in its collection is a work of Titian, even as an expert warned that art historians are best placed to make that call. Vladimir Ostrovsky said the State Hermitage Museum in St. Petersburg, Russia, conducted chemical and X-ray analyses that prove Titian's authorship.The portrait is part of a collection at the Museum of Western and Eastern Art in the Black Sea port of Odessa, headed by Ostrovsky, where in July 2008 Caravaggio's The Taking of Christ, also known as Judas' Kiss, was cut from its frame and stolen. That painting is still missing."Now we are nearly 100 percent certain that God has compensated us for the terrible loss that we suffered last year," Ostrovsky said in a telephone interview.But Sergei Androsov of the Hermitage's department of western European art said that only art historians can determine whether the painting is Titian's."The analysis shows that the canvas matches Titian's historical period, that the paint used matches his paint, that certain technical attributes match up," Androsov told The Associated Press. "But based on that it is impossible to judge whether the painting is a Titian. That is the work of art historians, not technical experts."Alexander Kosolapov, head of the Department for Scientific and Technical Examination at the State Hermitage, said the painting was given to the Odessa museum from the State Hermitage about 25 years ago."We know it is a 16th century Venetian painting, most likely either by Titian or Tintoretto," Kosolapov told the AP. "But right now it is not fully clear."Ostrovsky said the museum has invited art scholars from Moscow to further analyze the work. He did not allow the painting to be photographed in Odessa, but provided photos of what he said was the painting, showing a signature with the capital letter "T''.After the theft of the Caravaggio the museum is taking extra security precautions with the painting, but will still send it for exhibition abroad if its authenticity is confirmed, Ostrovsky said."Some people told us not to do anything with the Titian. But as they say, you can never stroll in the forest if you're always afraid of wolves," he said.

Thursday, 24 September 2009

Russian tower plans cause alarm







The UN's cultural watchdog has called on Russia to stop a 400m (1,312 ft) skyscraper being built in historic St Petersburg's city centre.
Unesco said the planned $2.4bn (£1.5bn) Okhta business centre tower would "damage the image of Russia".
Local authorities this week approved construction of the building, which will house offices of the state-controlled energy giant Gazprom.
St Petersburg's city centre is listed by Unesco as a world heritage site.
Unesco has warned the building of the skyscraper, which would tower over the city's Neva river and surrounding low-level buildings, could mean St Petersburg is added to the agency's list of endangered world heritage sites.
"We're hoping the (federal) decision to build it won't be taken," said Grigory Ordzhonikidze, the secretary-general of Unesco's Russian commission.
Twisting glass needle
The building's British designers describe the planned five-sided structure as a "396m-high twisting glass needle which echoes the spires across the city of St Petersburg".
St Petersburg usually has planning restrictions for buildings which are over 100m tall.
Announcing a relaxing of these rules for the skyscraper, Saint Petersburg Mayor Valentina Matviyenko said the Okhta project would bring more jobs and building projects to the city.

Gazprom, a key export earner for Russia, sees construction of the business centre and skyscraper as a prestige project that would boost the international image of Russia's second city, which was founded by Peter the Great in 1703.
But conservationists say the glass and metal structure - which would be three times as tall as St Petersburg's current tallest building, the St Peter and Paul Cathedral - would ruin the city's ambience.
Opponents have taken legal action to block the project and clashed with police at consultation sessions held by city authorities.
It remains unclear whether Moscow's central government could intervene to veto the skyscraper, which would take several years to build.
St Petersburg is the home city of President Vladimir Putin and Prsident Dmitry Medvedev, but has lagged behind Moscow in capitalising from the country's post-Soviet economic transformation.

British architectural company RMJM, which was appointed to design the building in December 2006, welcomed St Petersburg's decision to relax its building height limitations for the project, which it called "a major step forward for the city".
RMJM says the tower's design was inspired by the concept of energy in water, "with the form of the building deriving its shape from the changing nature of water, ever-changing light, reflections and refraction".
Unesco's national commissions are set up by member states to co-ordinate the organisation's work with national governments and NGOs.
Russia's Hermitage Museum and the St Petersburg Union of Architects had previously voiced opposition to Gazprom's plan.