EDINBURGH, Scotland -- The WikiLeaks whistleblower website has confirmed as true  a Sunday Herald investigation that found dozens of Russian-made tanks aboard a  ship hijacked by Somali pirates were destined for clandestine delivery to the  army of the autonomous Government of South Sudan.
Having taken the Ukrainian ship, the MV Faina, in September 2008, the pirates  were shocked to find aboard 33 Russian-made T-72 tanks, 42 anti-aircraft guns  and more than 800 tonnes of ammunition.
The Kenyan government quickly  condemned the hijacking of the Faina, saying that its destination was the port  of Mombasa and that the tanks had been bought for use by the Kenyan  Army.
A Sunday Herald investigation found that there were very few good  guys in the saga. The tanks, in addition to at least 67 previously shipped, were  in fact destined for delivery to the Government of South Sudan, which put it in  breach of Sudan’s 2005 Comprehensive Peace Agreement that ended a 21-year civil  war between north and south in which more than 2 million people  died.
Classified US State Department cables published by WikiLeaks show  not only that the Sunday Herald’s information was right as regards the tanks’  actual destination, but that Washington had encouraged the delivery of weapons  to South Sudan even though it was the main guarantor of the peace  agreement.
The WikiLeaks revelations about US-approved weapons deliveries  come at one of the most delicate times in the history of Sudan.
The  nation, Africa’s largest, is on the verge of splitting in two. Black African  Southern Sudanese, mainly animists and Christians, are scheduled to vote on  January 9 in a referendum for their independence from northern Sudan, which is  dominated by Muslim Arabs.
If things go wrong, world governments fear  Sudan could once more tip over into civil war.
US Secretary of State  Hillary Clinton has described the situation in advance of the historic  referendum as “a ticking time bomb”.
The WikiLeaks documents show that an  extraordinary row broke out between the United States government and the  governments of Kenya and Ukraine following the hijacking of the Faina and the  revelation of the secret weapons shipment.
Despite its secret approval of  previous weapons deliveries via Kenya to South Sudan, it appears that the  Washington administration began to lose its nerve as the affair became public  and threatened “sweeping sanctions” against both Kenya and Ukraine, asserting  that the tank deliveries were illegal.
The Kenyans were deeply angered  and “very confused” by the threats from President Barack Obama’s administration,  according to the leaked State Department cables, “since the past transfers had  been undertaken in consultation with the United States.”
The American  ambassador to Kenya, Michael Ranneberger, was given the impossible task of  reprimanding the Kenyans despite the fact that the weapons deliveries were  carried out with the full knowledge of Washington.
The cables said the  American flip-flop “led to a commotion on the Ukrainian side”.
In a story  worthy of John Le CarrĂ©, the Sunday Herald’s investigation, showed that the  owner of the Faina – which had at least three previous names and was registered  in Belize – is a Ukraine-based Israeli named Vadim Alperin, who has links to  Mossad, Israel’s intelligence agency, and Mossad agents front companies in  Kenya.
Alperin and the chief of Ukraine’s foreign intelligence service,  Mykola Malomuzh, together met the Faina when it arrived in Mombasa after the  United States 5th Fleet surrounded the vessel and the pirates settled for a  minimal $2 million ransom, paid in dollar bills and parachuted on to the Faina’s  deck from a light aircraft.
The cables indicate that the first  US-approved delivery of Russian tanks via Ukraine and Kenya to South Sudan took  place in 2007.
Before the Faina was hijacked, at least 67 T-72s had  already been delivered to the South Sudan government in Juba.
In the  northern city of Khartoum, capital of united Sudan, Ghazi Salah al-Din  al-Atabani, one of President Omar Hassan al-Bashir’s top advisers, chuckled as  he told a correspondent from the New York Times: “We knew it [American  involvement in the delivery of tanks to the South] – yeah, we knew  it.”
The Sunday Herald also revealed that Khartoum had kept quiet about  South Sudan’s armaments acquisitions because it was itself in breach of an  international arms embargo in relation to the separate conflict in the western  province of Darfur, for which President al-Bashir has been indicted for genocide  by The Hague-based International Criminal Court.
Given its problems with  Darfur and the ICC, it was in the interests of the al-Bashir government to stay  silent.
The leaked cables show the United States’ top diplomat in  Khartoum, Alberto Fernandez, advising Washington that in the case of any future  clandestine tank deliveries to South Sudan it should avoid a repeat hijacking by  Somali pirates and “the attention it has drawn.”
The tanks from the Faina  remain parked in a Kenyan army barracks near Nairobi.
 
No comments:
Post a Comment